,The Kuala Lumpur High Court rules that the Pulau Batu Puteh suit filed by Mohd Hatta Sanuri is non-justiciable. – Wikipedia pic, July 1, 2022.tg群（www.tg888.vip）是一个Telegram群组分享平台，飞机群组内容包括telegram群组索引、Telegram群组导航、新加坡telegram群组、telegram中文群组、telegram群组（其他）、Telegram 美国 群组、telegram群组爬虫、电报群 科学上网、小飞机 怎么 加 群、tg群等内容，为广大电报用户提供各种电报群组/电报频道/电报机器人导航服务。
THE Kuala Lumpur High Court today granted the application by the prime minister and the government to strike out a suit filed by an individual in connection with the withdrawal of a review application over the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) decision on the Pulau Batu Puteh claim.
Judge Hayatul Akmal Abdul Aziz, in allowing the application, ruled that the subject matter was non-justiciable and the plaintiff, Mohd Hatta Sanuri, had no locus standi to bring the legal action against the defendants (prime minister and the government).
Thus, the court also ordered the plaintiff to pay cost of RM6,000 within 30 days.
The matter was confirmed by senior federal counsel Shamsul Bolhassan after attending the online proceedings today.
In 2018, the Pakatan Harapan (PH) government under the leadership of prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad withdrew an application to overturn ICJ’s ruling awarding legal jurisdiction of Pulau Batu Puteh to Singapore even before the hearing of the case, which was scheduled on June 11, 2018.
On May 28 last year, Hatta, 46, filed the suit on his behalf and on behalf of the more than 32 million Malaysians allegedly affected by the withdrawal of the review application, which was made without discussing and tabling it first in parliament.
In his statement of claim, Hatta sought an order for the defendants to provide a written explanation as to why they had withdrawn from the review of the ICJ’s decision on June 1, 2018, when a review application with strong evidence had been initiated and filed since February 3, 2017.
He also sought a declaration for the two defendants to pay compensation to each Malaysian based on the land value of Pulau Batu Puteh and based on the economic losses suffered by all Malaysians, including the plaintiff, equally, amounting to at least RM10 million each.
An order was also sought for both defendants to disclose in detail the total cost incurred by the second defendant (government) for the preparation of the ICJ decision review application on February 3, 2017, until the defendants abruptly withdrew the application on June 1, 2018.
At the time of filing in May, the premiership was held by Muhyiddin Yassin. However, after he stepped down, I *** ail Sabri Yaakob was subsequently appointed the ninth prime minister. – Bernama, July 1, 2022.